Rahmenprogramm des BMBF zur Förderung der empirischen Bildungsforschung

Literaturdatenbank

Vollanzeige

    Pfeil auf den Link... Verfügbarkeit 
Autoren Köhler, Carmen; Pohl, Steffi; Carstensen, Claus H.  
Titel Taking the missing propensity into account when estimating competence scores. Evaluation of item response theory models for nonignorable omissions.  
URL https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414561785  
URN, persistent 10.1177/0013164414561785  
Erscheinungsjahr 2014, Jg. 75, H. 5  
Seitenzahl S. 1-25  
Zeitschrift Educational and Psychological Measurement  
ISSN 0013-1644; 1552-3888  
Dokumenttyp Zeitschriftenaufsatz; gedruckt; online  
Beigaben Literaturangaben, Abbildungen, Tabellen  
Sprache englisch  
Forschungsschwerpunkt Bildungspanel (NEPS)  
Schlagwörter Kompetenzmessung; Testdurchführung; Datenverarbeitung; Analyse; Methodik  
Abstract When competence tests are administered, subjects frequently omit items. These missing responses pose a threat to correctly estimating the proficiency level. Newer model-based approaches aim to take nonignorable missing data processes into account by incorporating a latent missing propensity into the measurement model. Two assumptions are typically made when using these models: (1) The missing propensity is unidimensional and (2) the missing propensity and the ability are bivariate normally distributed. These assumptions may, however, be violated in real data sets and could, thus, pose a threat to the validity of this approach. The present study focuses on modeling competencies in various domains, using data from a school sample (N = 15,396) and an adult sample (N = 7,256) from the National Educational Panel Study. Our interest was to investigate whether violations of unidimensionality and the normal distribution assumption severely affect the performance of the model-based approach in terms of differences in ability estimates. We propose a model with a competence dimension, a unidimensional missing propensity and a distributional assumption more flexible than a multivariate normal. Using this model for ability estimation results in different ability estimates compared with a model ignoring missing responses. Implications for ability estimation in large-scale assessments are discussed. (Orig.).  
Förderkennzeichen 01GJ0888