Rahmenprogramm des BMBF zur Förderung der empirischen Bildungsforschung

Literaturdatenbank

Vollanzeige

    Pfeil auf den Link... Verfügbarkeit 
Autoren Carstensen, Johann; Gottburgsen, Anja; Jungbauer-Gans, Monika  
Titel Measuring health in a longitudinal education study.  
URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11994-2_13  
URN, persistent 10.1007/978-3-658-11994-2_13  
Erscheinungsjahr 2016  
Sammelwerk Blossfeld, Hans-Peter (Hrsg.); Jutta, von Maurice (Hrsg.); Bayer, Michael (Hrsg.); Skopek, Jan (Hrsg.): Methodological issues of longitudinal surveys. The example of the national educational panel study.  
Seitenzahl S. 213-232  
Verlag Wiesbaden: Springer VS  
ISBN 978-3-658-11992-8; 978-3-658-11994-2  
Dokumenttyp Sammelwerksbeitrag; gedruckt; online  
Beigaben Literaturangaben  
Sprache englisch  
Forschungsschwerpunkt Bildungspanel (NEPS)  
Schlagwörter Gesundheit; Datengewinnung; Qualität; Essstörung; Körpergröße; Gewicht  
Abstract When analyzing health in an educational study, there are some methodological aspects and problems that must be considered. In this paper, we address questions of data quality in the measurement of health outcomes. It is possible that data quality can be biased by social desirability since questions on health (e. g., on eating disorders or body height and weight) are fairly sensitive items, and accordingly, the impact of the privacy of the setting increases with the sensitivity of the questions. Therefore, we expect mode effects resulting from the way the data are collected. Following a methodological discussion of these issues, empirical analyses are presented. We compare the measuring of body height, weight, BMI, and the likelihood of having an eating disorder in the NEPS with data from reference studies (KiGGS and GEDA from 2010) carried out by the Robert Koch Institute. To conduct the analysis of BMI, we use the Kindergarten cohort, the ninth graders, and the adults’ cohort. The eating disorder scale is compared for ninth graders only. The results show some differences between NEPS data and the reference data, which point towards an influence of the interview situation. In about half of our comparisons, no significant deviations between the datasets can be found. A short section describes some further thoughts on endogeneity problems. (Orig.).  
Förderkennzeichen 01GJ0888