Rahmenprogramm des BMBF zur Förderung der empirischen Bildungsforschung

Literaturdatenbank

Vollanzeige

    Pfeil auf den Link... Verfügbarkeit 
Autoren Jarsinski, Stephan; Frahm, Sarah; Blatt, Inge; Bos, Wilfried; Kanders, Michael  
Titel Assessing spelling competence development in the National Educational Panel Study.  
URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11994-2_24  
URN, persistent 10.1007/978-3-658-11994-2_24  
Erscheinungsjahr 2016  
Sammelwerk Blossfeld, Hans-Peter (Hrsg.); Jutta, von Maurice (Hrsg.); Bayer, Michael (Hrsg.); Skopek, Jan (Hrsg.): Methodological issues of longitudinal surveys.  
Seitenzahl S. 427-439  
Verlag Wiesbaden: Springer VS  
ISBN 978-3-658-11992-8; 978-3-658-11994-2  
Dokumenttyp Sammelwerksbeitrag; gedruckt; online  
Beigaben Literaturangaben  
Sprache englisch  
Forschungsschwerpunkt Bildungspanel (NEPS)  
Schlagwörter Rechtschreibung; Schreibkompetenz; Item-Response-Theorie; Item; Design; Schüler; Sekundarstufe I  
Abstract In the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS), spelling competence is a stagespecific measure for secondary school (Stage 4). This is a challenging task because the current state of research does not offer a theory-based and empirically proven instrument that would allow for longitudinal measurement. In this paper, we present results from NEPS pilot studies in order to illustrate our work. For our research, we used an anchor-item design and IRT-based methods to verify the suitability of the test for the longitudinal survey of spelling competence. We demonstrate the reliability of the tests with regard to dimensionality and discrimination. The person parameter and the item parameter provide an insight into the item difficulty and the students’ abilities, thereby guaranteeing that the tests account for individual demands throughout secondary school. Moreover, deviance and the correlational structure of the data are taken into consideration. In summary, the selected test design and the choice of anchor items ensure that an adequate test is administered to each student. We removed about 15 – 30 % of the items in each grade to obtain a fit model. As the results for Grades 5 to 7 are nearly identical, it can be assumed that the test is reliable. The assumed five-dimensional model proves to be most adequate to measure the subskills for all grades because the deviance is lower. (Orig.).  
Förderkennzeichen 01GJ0888